Vendor inspection is the buyer’s QA/QC at the supplier’s works to verify materials and equipment against the PO, drawings, and referenced standards. It covers ITP/QCP review, staged in-process checks, witness/hold points, FAT, and documentation. Inspectors collect objective evidence and accept/reject strictly per API/ASME/ISO/EN referenced by the project spec.
Vendor Inspection — Plain Definition (clear & practical)
Vendor inspection (a.k.a. supplier or source inspection) is product/job-focused QA/QC performed at the manufacturer or sub-vendor to confirm conformity before shipment. It aligns the ITP (Inspection & Test Plan), witness/hold points, and acceptance “as per API/ASME/ISO/EN referenced by the project spec.”
Where it happens
- Supplier’s fabrication/assembly line
- Sub-vendor special processes (e.g., heat treatment, coatings, NDE)
- Factory Acceptance Testing (FAT) bays and certified test labs
Scope vs. vendor audit
- Inspection = does this item/job meet PO/drawings/ITP and the referenced standard?
- Audit = does the quality management system meet ISO 9001 or buyer requirements?
Why Vendor Inspection Matters (outcomes, not fluff)
- Prevents cost & delay: catches nonconformities before shipment/site works.
- Compliance by design: acceptance is applied per the cited clauses (no ad-hoc limits).
- Traceability you can trust: MTCs, calibrated instruments, tagged photos, IRs/NCRs tied to serials.
- Risk-based visibility: right witness vs hold points at the right stages.
- Smoother FAT & release: clean dossiers, reduce punch lists and disputes.
TPI vs. In-House Inspector (quick rule-of-thumb)
- Third-Party Inspection (TPI): independent assurance for high-risk/critical equipment, remote vendors, or when buyer bandwidth is limited.
- In-house/buyer’s inspector: when deep product knowledge or close coordination with engineering is key.
Either way, acceptance remains per the project-referenced API/ASME/ISO/EN.
Roles & Responsibilities in Vendor Inspection (RACI)
Goal: remove ambiguity. Every task has one Accountable, clear Responsible parties, and informed C/I stakeholders. Acceptance is always per API/ASME/ISO/EN referenced by the project spec.
RACI Matrix (example — adapt to your PO)
| Task / Deliverable | Buyer/Owner QA | EPC / SQE | Manufacturer QA/QC | TPI | End User/Ops |
| Prepare QCP/ITP | C | C | R | C | I |
| Approve ITP & W/H points | A | C | C | C | I |
| Notify visits (1–2 wks) | C | R | R | R | I |
| Document screen (PO, dwgs, MTCs, cal certs) | A | R | R | C | I |
| In-process surveillance | A | C | R | R | I |
| Special processes (weld/HT/coat/NDE) | A | C | R | R | I |
| FAT execution & records | A | C | R | R | I |
| Issue IR (inspection report) | A | C | R | R | I |
| Raise/close NCR | A | C | R | R | I |
| Gauge/instrument calibration control | I | C | R | C | I |
| Final dossier compilation | A | C | R | C | I |
| Release note/shipping clearance | A | C | R | C | I |
Need a working ITP? Grab the vendor inspection ITP template to align tasks, witness/hold points, and records.
Buyer/Owner QA/QC — Accountability & Acceptance
- Owns acceptance: applies criteria as per referenced standards in the PO/ITP.
- Approves ITP/QCP; defines W/H points and evidence required.
- Reviews/approves deviations/concessions; signs release.
- Ensures traceability (tags/serials), calibration policy, and dossier completeness.
Manufacturer QA/QC — Execution & Evidence
- Prepares QCP/ITP; controls fabrication, special processes, and sub-vendors.
- Ensures calibrated instruments, qualified procedures/personnel.
- Runs FAT to approved procedures; compiles IRs, charts, MTCs, certificates, photos.
- Delivers a clean final dossier mapped to item/tag and ITP.
Third-Party Inspection (TPI) — Independent Verification
- Performs surveillance to the approved ITP; witnesses W/H points.
- Issues IRs with objective facts (readings, clause refs, instrument IDs).
- Raises NCRs when acceptance isn’t met; verifies corrections/re-tests.
- Maintains independence; reports to the buyer/owner.
EPC / Supplier Quality Engineering — Coordination
- Aligns schedule, readiness, and notifications; ensures sub-vendor coverage.
- Tracks actions from IR/NCR to closure; keeps stakeholders C/I as agreed.
- Checks that procedures cite the correct standard/edition.
End User / Operations — Service Criticality
- Provides service-critical requirements (e.g., shutdown impacts, operability checks).
- May witness FAT for function/controls; remains Informed on quality status.
Handover Essentials (don’t skip these)
- Before first visit: approved ITP/QCP, latest drawings/datasheets, referenced standards list, test procedures, calibration status.
- At FAT start: readiness sheet, tag/serial list, gauge IDs and valid cal certs, safety permits.
- At release: signed IRs, NCR log (closed), test charts, MTCs/CoC, NDE reports, photos, release note—all per project spec.
The Vendor Inspection Process (PO → Release)
Step 1 — Contract Inputs & Kick-off
- Gather baselines: PO, datasheets, drawings/BOM, manufacturing schedule, sub-vendor list.
- List referenced standards: API/ASME/ISO/EN as named in the project spec (no ad-hoc criteria).
- Draft QCP/ITP: define stages, witness (W) and hold (H) points, objective evidence required.
- Comms & notifications: who invites whom, lead-times (e.g., 7–14 days), site safety/permits.
Need a structured starter? Use the vendor inspection ITP template to align W/H points and records.
Step 2 — ITP/QCP Review & Approval
Align the ITP with risk, schedule, and acceptance per the standards referenced by the project spec.
ITP Review Checklist (paste into your doc)
| Item | Reference | Acceptance reference | Status | Action owner |
| Latest drawings/datasheets listed | PO / doc register | Per order | ☐ | |
| Each stage has W/H point defined | ITP §… | Per project spec | ☐ | |
| Test procedures cite correct standard/edition | Procedures | Per referenced standard | ☐ | |
| Records required (charts, MTCs, cal certs, photos) | ITP §… | Per project spec | ☐ | |
| Sub-vendor controls included | QCP §… | Per project spec | ☐ |
Step 3 — In-Process Surveillance & Special Processes
Monitor manufacturing and special processes; apply acceptance per the cited clauses (welding, heat-treat, coating, NDE).
Stage Control Plan (example)
| Stage | Key checks | Acceptance reference | Records |
| Casting/forging receipt | ID/qty, condition, certs | Per order & referenced standard | IR, photos |
| Welding & WPS/PQR | Welder quals, parameters | Per ASME IX/ISO welding as referenced | Logs, WQRs |
| Heat treatment | Cycle, soak, charts | Per project spec/standard | HT chart, IR |
| Coating/lining | DFT, cure, holiday test | Per project coating spec | DFT log, photos |
| Dimensional checks | F2F, flanges, interfaces | Per drawings/standard | Sheet, IR |
Reduce repeat NCRs with preventive controls and staging—see prevent vendor nonconformities.
Step 4 — FAT (Factory Acceptance Testing)
Run functional/performance tests to approved procedures; instruments must be calibrated and traceable.
FAT Readiness Checklist
| Item | Status | Evidence |
| Approved procedures on bench | ☐ | Rev/date |
| Gauge/recorder cal certs valid | ☐ | Cert IDs |
| Tag/serial list printed | ☐ | List v… |
| Safety permits (LOTO, pressure) | ☐ | Permit IDs |
| Witness roster confirmed | ☐ | Emails |
During FAT
- Record readings, instrument IDs, and photo IDs.
- Acceptance is per API/ASME/ISO/EN referenced by the project spec (do not invent values).
- Log deviations immediately; contain, correct, re-test.
Step 5 — Dossier & Release
Compile objective evidence; map every record to item/tag.
Final Dossier Index (starter)
| Section | Contents | Acceptance reference | Signatures |
| Admin | PO, datasheet, drawings | Per order | Buyer/Vendor |
| ITP/QCP | Approved copies, W/H log | Per project spec | Buyer |
| Material | MTCs, trace map | Per referenced standard | Vendor |
| Process | Welding/HT/Coating records | Per referenced standard | Vendor/Inspector |
| Tests | FAT charts, setpoints | Per referenced standard | Inspector |
| NDE | Reports, maps | Per referenced standard | Level II/III |
| NCRs | Log, dispositions | Per procedure | Buyer |
| Photos | Tagged, dated | Per project spec | — |
| Release | IRs, release note | Per order | Buyer |
Witness & Hold Points (How to Set Them)
Typical W/H Map (risk-based)
| Stage | Risk rationale | W/H | Acceptance reference | Required records |
| First-article dimensional | Fit-up risk | W | Per drawings/standard | Dim sheet, IR |
| Weld procedure/qualification | Pressure boundary | H | Per welding standard referenced | WPS/PQR/WQR |
| Heat treatment cycle | Mechanical props | W | Per project spec/standard | HT chart |
| NDE on critical welds | Hidden defects | W | Per NDE standard referenced | NDE report/map |
| Performance/FAT | Function & safety | H | Per API/ASME/ISO/EN referenced | Charts, photos |
| Final inspection & dossier | Shipment readiness | H | Per order/spec | Signed index, release |
Practical tips
- Tie W/H to highest risk and irreversible steps.
- Define prerequisites (e.g., “Do not proceed to FAT until cal certs verified”).
- Set notification windows and alternates to avoid slips.
- Use clear pass/fail language: “Acceptance as per clause X of the referenced standard.”
Vendor Inspection Standards & Acceptance (placeholders, no numbers)
Rule: do not invent values. Apply acceptance as per API/ASME/ISO/EN referenced by the project spec and the edition named in the PO/ITP.
Quick Reference Map (use only if referenced by your project)
| Area | Common standard (if applicable) | How it’s used in vendor inspection |
| Pressure/functional tests (valves/packages) | API 598; ISO 5208; EN 12266-1/2 | Tightness/shell tests at FAT per referenced clauses |
| Pressure equipment design/tests | ASME VIII / EN 13445 (where applicable) | Hydro/ pneumatic tests per spec; dossier evidence |
| Piping/fabrication | ASME B31.x / EN piping codes | Dimensional/NDE per referenced sections |
| Dimensions & flanges | ASME/EN B16 series (as named) | Face-to-face, bolt circles per drawings/standard |
| Welding & brazing | ASME IX / ISO 15614/9606 | WPS/PQR/WQR per referenced welding code |
| NDE methods | ASME V / ISO 17635 et al. | PT/MT/UT/RT extent & acceptance per project |
| Materials & MTCs | EN 10204 (cert types) | Trace heats to tags/serials; certificate validity |
| Coating/lining | Project coating spec; ISO series (as named) | DFT/holiday/cure checks per spec |
| Calibration & labs | Project calibration procedure; ISO/IEC 17025 (labs) | Valid cal certs matched to instrument IDs |
Always cite: “Acceptance per <standard/edition> referenced by the project spec.” Do not restate numeric limits.
Examples & Templates (copy/paste into your program)
Vendor Inspection IR (Inspection Report) — Field Set
| Field | What to record |
| Supplier / Location | Works, bay, sub-vendor if any |
| PO / Item / Tag-Serial | Exact identifiers (match to dossier) |
| Stage / W/H point | From approved ITP |
| Procedure & Standard reference | Doc IDs + clause/edition as referenced |
| Instruments | IDs + valid calibration |
| Observations | Measured values, photos (IDs), defects |
| Result | Conform / NCR raised |
| Attachments | Charts, MTCs, NDE, photos |
| Inspector & Buyer | Names, signatures/date |
NCR Workflow (practical, fast)
- Contain: stop use/ship; mark item/tag.
- Correct: repair/rework per approved procedure & standard reference.
- Verify: re-inspect/re-test; record clause and readings.
- Concession (if needed): buyer QA approves or rejects.
- Close: update dossier; prevent recurrence (link to CAPA).
Release Readiness Checklist
- Approved ITP/QCP; all W/H signed.
- IRs, charts, NDE, MTCs/CoC mapped to tags/serials.
- Calibration certificates current and referenced in reports.
- Deviations/NCRs closed or concession approved by buyer.
- Final dossier index signed; release note issued.
When the Item Is a Valve
Inspecting valves? Use our dedicated, step-by-step guide: Valve Inspection Checklist — visual/markings, dimensional, materials/traceability, and pressure/functional tests with placeholders as per API 598 / ISO 5208 / EN 12266 referenced by your project.
FAQs — Vendor Inspection
What is vendor inspection?
Buyer’s QA/QC at the supplier to verify conformity to the PO/drawings and referenced standards via ITP-driven checks, W/H points, FAT, and documentation.
Who prepares and who approves the ITP?
The manufacturer prepares; buyer/owner QA approves. TPI may review. Acceptance follows the standard/edition referenced by the project.
What’s the difference between expediting and inspection?
Expediting drives schedule/readiness; inspection verifies quality and acceptance per standards.
Are witness and hold points mandatory?
Where the ITP defines them and the buyer requires them. Use W for visibility, H where irreversible risk exists.
Which standards apply to vendor inspection?
Only those named in the project spec/PO (e.g., API/ASME/ISO/EN). Apply acceptance per the cited clauses—don’t invent limits.
What must be in a final supplier dossier?
Approved drawings/ITP, IRs, test charts, MTCs/CoC, NDE, certificates, photos, deviations/waivers, and release note—as required by the order.
Who raises and who closes NCRs?
Inspector (buyer/TPI) can raise; the buyer/owner approves concession/closure after verified correction.
Can TPI replace in-house inspection?
TPI adds independence; use for high-risk items or vendor locations. Acceptance remains per project-referenced standards.
Download: Sample ITP & IR Forms (ZIP)
Filename: Sample_ITP_IR_Forms.zip
- Editable ITP template with W/H points and acceptance placeholders per referenced standards.
- Inspection Report (IR) form + NCR register to track findings and dispositions.
- Final dossier index to standardize evidence and speed release.
CTA: Download the Sample ITP & IR Forms (ZIP) and start your vendor inspection program today.
Vendor Inspection Training — Upskill Your Team
Want structured practice and real checklists? Join Vendor Inspection Training — plan ITPs, set witness/hold points, run FATs, and apply acceptance as per the standards your projects reference.
Vendor Inspection vs Expediting vs Audit (clear comparison)
| Topic | Vendor Inspection | Expediting | Vendor Audit |
| Primary aim | Verify product/job quality against PO/drawings and referenced standards | Drive schedule/readiness, materials on time | Assess QMS/system capability |
| Evidence | Measurements, charts, IR/NCR, photos, tag/serial traceability | Milestones, dates, material arrival, manpower | Procedures, records, internal audits |
| Tools | ITP/QCP, witness/hold points, FAT | Look-ahead plan, risk log, recovery plan | Checklist vs ISO 9001 or buyer criteria |
| Acceptance | Per API/ASME/ISO/EN referenced by project spec | N/A (schedule metrics) | Conformance to system requirements |
| Outcome | Release note / ship-clearance (or NCR) | Schedule recovery actions | Audit report & CAPA |
| Who leads | Buyer QA/QC / TPI | Project controls / expeditor | Supplier quality / buyer audit team |
Email Templates (plug-and-play)
1) Vendor Inspection Notification (W/H point)
Subject: Inspection Notification — PO [####], Item/Tag [####], [W/H] at [Vendor, City] on [Date]
Hello Team,
As per the approved ITP, we plan the [Witness/Hold] for [Stage: e.g., FAT / NDE / Dimensional] on [Date, Time, Timezone] at [Vendor, Address].
References: PO [####], Drawing/Datasheet [IDs], Procedure [ID/Rev], standard/edition as referenced by project spec.
Readiness: procedures at bench, tag/serial list, valid calibration certificates for instruments to be used.
Please confirm attendance or share alternates.
Regards,
[Name], Buyer QA/QC
2) FAT Agenda & Readiness Check
Subject: FAT Agenda — PO [####], Package/Valve [####], [Dates]
Attached: FAT steps, hold/witness points, instrument IDs & cal certs, safety permits.
Acceptance will be applied as per API/ASME/ISO/EN referenced by the project spec.
Kindly acknowledge readiness and provide any constraints 48h prior.
— [Name], Supplier Quality
Inspection Report (IR) — worked example (concise)
- Supplier / Location: Acme Valves, Bay 3 (Sub-vendor: Seat Overlay Ltd.)
- PO / Item / Tag-Serial: PO 450123 / Gate Valve DN150 / GV-0150-A01
- Stage / W/H: FAT — Hold (H)
- Procedure & Standard Ref: FAT-VAL-012 Rev.2; acceptance per API 598 (edition per project spec)
- Instruments: Pressure gauge G-245 (cal valid), Recorder R-009 (cal valid)
- Observations: Hydrostatic shell test run; stabilization achieved; no visible leakage; seat leak test per procedure; readings attached (Charts C-112 to C-114).
- Result: Conformant to referenced clauses; No NCR
- Attachments: Charts C-112…C-114; photos P-021…P-030; tag map; cal certs list
- Inspector / Buyer: J. Smith (TPI) / A. Novak (Buyer QA)
(Note: no numbers quoted; acceptance tied to the standard referenced by the project.)
One-Page Pocket Checklist (on-site use)
Before you start
- Approved ITP/QCP on the table; correct standard/edition listed.
- Latest drawings/datasheets; tag/serial list printed.
- Calibration certificates valid and mapped to instruments.
Sequence
- Documentation screen (PO, procedures, MTCs, cal certs).
- Visual/markings (nameplate, size/class/material, preservation).
- Dimensional (F2F, flanges/threads, interfaces) — acceptance per drawings/standard.
- Materials & traceability (MTCs; PMI/hardness if specified).
- NDE (if required) — extent/acceptance per referenced clauses.
- FAT (hydrostatic, seat leak, functional) — as per API/ASME/ISO/EN referenced by project.
- Close-out (IR, NCR if any, charts, photos, final dossier index, release note).
Golden rules
- Record facts (values, IDs, photos), not opinions.
- Never choose ad-hoc leakage categories or hold times; use the referenced standard.
- Every record maps to one tag/serial.
Where to Go Next (one click each)
- Build your plan: Vendor Inspection ITP Template
- Avoid repeat findings: Prevent Vendor Nonconformities
- If your item is a valve: Valve Inspection Checklist
Training for your team?
Enroll in Vendor Inspection Training — plan ITPs, set witness/hold points, run FATs, and apply acceptance as per the standards your projects reference.